A Guide for the design and implementation of a service-learning (SL)

CHAPTER I CHAPTER II CHAPTER III CHAPTER IV CHAPTER V

Critical Thinking

Critical Thinking

Level 2: Analyzes and questions the coherence of his/her own and others' professional judgments, proposing possible solutions to what has been questioned . Level 3: Discusses critical positions based on the disciplinary framework, valuing the personal, social and professional implications, assuming responsibility for those decisions.

Definition: Mental process that questions situations and is interested in the fundamentals that are at the basis of the own and others' ideas, actions and professional judgment. The Student first ask him/herself about the reality in which he/she lives, reflecting on it and formulating his/her own judgments and arguments. Afterwards, he/she analyzes the judgments of others, differentiates ideas and underlying values, and then adopts a constructive attitude and posture in the analysis of external judgments, becoming aware of the practical implications of the judgments, to finally assume responsibility for these decisions. Levels of mastery: Level 1: Questions and raises questions about reality, actively participating in debates about reality, so as to reflect and give opinions about the consequences of their own decisions. Description :

Levels of mastery

Indicators

Asks questions and investigates reality, reflecting on it.

Level 1: Questions and raises questions about reality, actively participating in debates about reality, so as to reflect and give opinions about the consequences of their own decisions.

Differentiates objective facts from opinions and assessments.

Formulates his/her own assessments and judgments based on his/her systematic reflection on reality. Analyzes correctly judgments or decisions based on opinions and assessments. Participates constructively in debates contributing to the development of a deep and shared reflection.

Level 2: Analyzes and questions the coherence of his/her own and others' professional judgments, proposing possible solutions to what has been questioned.

Analyzes and gives importance to the pros and cons of the effects of the proposed decisions.

Defends and supports with conviction his/her professional assessments and judgments.

Asks for, values and appreciates feedback from others in relation to his/her conduct.

Level 3: Discusses critical positions based on the disciplinary framework, valuing the personal, social and professional implications, assuming responsibility for those decisions

Defends the rights of individuals and groups against particular positions and interests.

Demonstrates consistency in his/her conduct with the values he/she states.

TOOLS FOR FIELD WORK

TOOLS FOR FIELD WORK

96

97